65 Lit. "their conduct and living was with."
71 Beelen suggests the reading "from,"or to render the present text "by."
1 History of the Christian Church, vol. ii. p. 436, new edition.
2 See the Introductory Note of the Edinburgh translator.
3 Uhlhorn, article Clementines. Schaff Herzog, i. p. 497. A second Epitome has been published by Dressel; see Introductory notice to Homilies.
4 Lechler, Apostolic and Post-Apostolic Times, ii. p 268, Edinburgh translation, 1886, from 3rd edition.
6 Comp. Uhlhorn, p. 392; Schaff, History, ii. p. 436; Lechler, ii. p. 288. See Schaff-Herzog, i. art. Elkesaites.
7 See Hippolytus, Refutation of all Heresies, book ix. 8-12, Ante-Nicene Fathers, vol. v. pp. 131-134. The forms occur in chap. 10, pp. 132, 133.
8 See Recognitions, i. 45-48: Homilies. Epistle of Peter to James, 4, Homily xiv. 1.
9 3 This is the last opinion of Uhlhorn (Herzog, Real-Encykl, 1877. art. Clementinen; comp. Schaff-Herzog, i. p. 498). This author had previously defended the priority of the Homilies (Die Homilien and Recoginitionen des Clemens romanus, Gottingen, 1854; comp. Herzog, edition of 1854, art. Clementinen).
10 Die Clementine nebst den verwandten Schriften, and der Ebionitismus, Hamburg, 1844.
11 Die Clementinischen Recognitionen and Homilien, nach il re2~2 Urspriung and Inhalt dargestellt, Jena, 1848.
12 See supra, note 3. Uhlhorn found the nucleus of the literature in Homilies, xvi.-xix.
13 Die Clementinischen Schriften, Gotha, 1869.
14 Die Quellen der romischen Petrussage, Kiel, 1872.
15 Apostolic and Post-Apostolic Times, vol. ii. p. 270.
16 So Hilgenfeld, Lehmann, Uhlhorn.
17 See especially Homilies, xvii. 19. Here there is "probably only an incidental sneer at Paul" (Schaff, History, ii.. p. 438).
1 [See supra, p. 69, and Introductory Notice to Homilies.-R.]