174 [This anthropopathy is a figure by which God is interpreted to us after the intelligible forms of humanity. Language framed by human usage makes this figure necessary to revelation.]
178 e0ntau=qa th\n gnw=sin polupragmonei= appears in the text, which, with great probability, is supposed to be a marginal note which got into the text, the indicative being substituted for the imperative.
179 Matt. x. 24, 25; Luke vi. 40.
180 Adopting Sylburgius' conjecture of tw=| de/ for to\ de/.
181 Perhaps in allusion to the leper's words to Christ, "If Thou wilt, Thou canst make me clean" (Mark i. 40).
34 183 [See p. 192, supra, and the note.]
189 Prov. xvi. 21, misquoted, or the text is corrupt; "The wise in heart shall be called prudent," A.V.
190 For the use of knowledge in this connection, Philo, Sextus Empiricus, and Zeno are quoted.
192 "These words are more like Philo Judaeus, i. 740, than those of Moses, Deut. xx. 5-7."-Potter.
197 [See Epistle of Barnabas, vol. p. i. 149, S.]
199 Lev. xix. 9, xxiii. 22; Deut. xxiv. 19.
200 Lev. xix. 10; Deut. xxiv. 20, 21.
201 Ex. xxxiii. 10, 11; Lev. xxv. 2-7.
202 Prov. xx. 28, xi. 26, xiv. 21.
203 Quoted from Philo, with slight alterations, giving the sense of Ex. xxiii. 4, Deut xxii. 12, 3.
205 Lev. xix. 33, 34; Deut. x. 19, xxiii. 7.
206 mnhsiponhrei= (equivalent to mnhsikakei= in the passage of Philo from which Clement is quoting) has been substituted by Sylb for misoponhrei=.
210 Matt. v. vi. vii.; Luke vi.
211 Prov. xix. 11, xiv. 23, xvii. 12.
213 Deut. xxv. 4; 1 Tim. v. 18.
215 [See Hermas, Visions, note 2, p. 15, this volume.]
216 So Clement seems to designate the human nature of Christ,-as being a quartum quid in addition to the three persons of the Godhead. [A strange note: borrowed from ed. Migne. The incarnation of the second person is a quartum quid, of course; but not, in our author's view, "an addition to the three persons of the Godhead."]
221 i9ke/thn has been adopted from Philo, instead of oi0ke/thn of the text.